diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/rob | 18 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/rsc | 14 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/theo | 45 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/troll | 12 |
4 files changed, 89 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -334,3 +334,21 @@ I support the idea of unrecorded talks. We do not accept patches Syntax highlighting is juvenile. Working as designed. +I've written programs with twenty implementations of io.Reader inside. +Who cares? Shut up. +What is wrong with my analysis? +I just want to explain something. +I recommend in the strongest terms that you don't do this. +Sockets are the X windows of IO interfaces. +Ignore what I wrote. +In other words, here's how to do it but don't do it. +I did indeed. +I don't understand what you mean by 'reset'. +I am, and as far as I can tell it makes no difference whatsoever. +Please put this silly objection to rest. It has no merit. +Interpretations will vary. +I think the pattern used well is perfectly acceptable in certain situations. +Like everything that attracts scrutiny, the key point is to use the idea well: safely, clearly, correctly, and only when appropriate. +I am not trying to be difficult, but you must understand it's not simple to address your question. +One step at a time. +Thanks for grinding through those. @@ -205,3 +205,17 @@ Thank you for writing a 3rd party tool. It's true that there are no plans yet, but I think it's also true that we need to start planning. Yes, that's confusing. Please do not spend time on this. +Maybe this is true, but I haven't seen it. +The fundamental design question here is whether the benefit outweighs the complexity being added. +Enough with the religion. Please. +It should just work. +Sorry for not replying earlier. I don't really know. +Great. +This seems OK. +Let's take our time and do it right (whatever that is). +Really we're just behind on triaging bugs. +I'll dig the code up and post it somewhere. I never made it truly usable. +Will follow up off list. +Wait a second. +I think it's always been this way. +I would wait until there's a more established pattern of a problem before introducing additional mechanisms. @@ -522,3 +522,48 @@ There are too few of us, we cannot take on every problem. Everyone, please ignore these trolls who are cross-posting. Essentially, you are on your own. :-) I am not so sure. +obviously. +I don't know, but I'll think about it later, because I am busy. +So the original idea wasn't yours. And now you think it can't work. And you are still talking about it. I see. Very interesting. +That statement is full of potential for misunderstanding, and cannot be left alone. +I was wrong. +Thanks. +Careful there :-) +That is incorrect advice for the OpenBSD world. +Your mistake. +This bug report totally sucks. +what is "this case"? +my advice: walk away from this one. +Generally Unix has no way of doing this. +So what do you really mean here? +Is a crash a performance impact? +what is the goal? +Your emails only contain opinions. +words words words words +Are you done? +Doesn't that send shivers down your spine? +Your bug report is too incomplete. Can't help you. +No. +We'd rather jump off a cliff. +Good luck with that. +Looking forward to you providing code which solves the problem. +This feature is probably older than you. +it is behaving *exactly* as intended. +There are a few compromises. +I think I know a perfect candidate to take this further: You. +Seriously? +The OpenBSD process is quite well understood. Use the best methods, doubt what you do, refractor. +Hey, it looks like you are just trying to be a dick. +Does your mother know? +It's great that you have an opinion. +Run something else! We don't care! +That's a load of bull. +Your opinions count for zero. +To achieve merit, you must do the homework you assigned yourself. +Get serious. +and I wanna build a rocket ship... +No thanks. +The problem is obvious. +If you don't have the skill to do it, well that's too bad... +You didn't do your homework, and it blew up in your face. Then you wrote a few paragraphs. Then I replied. That is the whole sad story. +I tried to read the rest of what you wrote. It makes no sense. @@ -229,3 +229,15 @@ Subject: [golang-dev] vendoring the stdlib [harvey-commits] [PATCH 2/2] Compile Harvey in C11 mode. [harvey] we need to bring sam back [harvey] booting a disk +[Harvey] Harvey broken for me +[harvey] Cannot boot with QEMU +[harvey] we don't have a repeatable build process +[harvey] Git clone not working +[harvey] today's broken build +[9fans] need a REAL WORKING iso +[harvey] There is interest in harvey here at the riscv workshop +[harvey] gerrit hell +[harvey] Harvey fails to boot in qemu +[golang-dev] godoc.org is down +[harvey-commits] chdir regression test +[harvey] FOSDEM |