fortunes: ./configure CFLAGS="-I$HOME/source/harvey/ape/amd64/include -I$HOME/source/harvey/ape/include -mno-red-zone -ffreestanding -fno-builtin -nostdlib -trigraphs -D_SUSV2_SOURCE -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_LIMITS_EXTENSION -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_BSD_EXTENSION -DHAVE_SOCK_OPTS -DHARVEY -DPlan9" LDFLAGS="-static $HOME/source/harvey/ape/amd64/lib/crt1.o $HOME/source/harvey/ape/amd64/lib/crti.o $HOME/source/harvey/ape/amd64/lib/crtn.o -L$HOME/source/harvey/ape/amd64/lib -L$HOME/source/harvey/amd64/lib" LIBS="-lbsd -lap -lc" LIBM="" --prefix=$HOME/source/harvey/ape/ports *--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --build=x86_64-harvey *--enable-shared=no

1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/rsc b/lib/rsc
index 9d843fa86..cb56874b8 100644
--- a/lib/rsc
+++ b/lib/rsc
@@ -205,3 +205,17 @@ Thank you for writing a 3rd party tool.
 It's true that there are no plans yet, but I think it's also true that we need to start planning.
 Yes, that's confusing.
 Please do not spend time on this.
+Maybe this is true, but I haven't seen it.
+The fundamental design question here is whether the benefit outweighs the complexity being added.
+Enough with the religion. Please.
+It should just work.
+Sorry for not replying earlier. I don't really know.
+Great.
+This seems OK.
+Let's take our time and do it right (whatever that is).
+Really we're just behind on triaging bugs.
+I'll dig the code up and post it somewhere. I never made it truly usable.
+Will follow up off list.
+Wait a second.
+I think it's always been this way.
+I would wait until there's a more established pattern of a problem before introducing additional mechanisms.