| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
There's no reason to have duplicate enums
|
|
Closes #1749
|
|
Without the immediate frame event, the button event would not be processed in time: https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/phoc/issues/
|
|
Frame events group logically connected pointer events. It makes sense to make
the backend responsible for sending frame events, since once the events are
split (ie. once the frame events are stripped) it's not easy to figure out
which events belongs to which frame again.
This is also how Weston handles frame events.
Fixes https://github.com/swaywm/wlroots/issues/1468
|
|
As evdev-proto is installed by CI some files have been missed:
../examples/pointer-constraints.c:2:10: fatal error: 'linux/input-event-codes.h' file not found
#include <linux/input-event-codes.h>
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../examples/relative-pointer-unstable-v1.c:5:10: fatal error: 'linux/input-event-codes.h' file not found
#include <linux/input-event-codes.h>
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
This also allows us to remove xcb-xkb, since Xinput will now give us the
appropriate XKB modifiers with each event.
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the Xlib connection is removed, this _conn suffix is going to be
pointless. I'm removing this preemtively for that.
|
|
This prevents some annoying issues when e.g. not including wlr/config.h or
making a typo in the guard name.
|
|
This reverts commit ef0a6ea4d2934ec014d791150c42348061ec4f7f, reversing
changes made to 8d03bc9178d8544cbcd24293ece6ac9f1698e602.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We do this in a backend independent way in wlr_cursor now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
handle_x11_event() and x11_handle_input_event() react to different kinds
of events, so it does not make much of a difference if
x11_handle_input_event() signals if it handled an event or not.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
