From 813e5c23ed9c62e157d5173da7c1adf9f908753d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Ser Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 18:20:29 +0200 Subject: governance: improve consistency of ACK requirements For "ext" and "wp", the document uses the wording "ACKed by at least 3 members". For "ext", the document uses the wording "ACKed by at least one other member". This is confusing, let's just use the same wording everywhere. Signed-off-by: Simon Ser --- GOVERNANCE.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/GOVERNANCE.md b/GOVERNANCE.md index 76606db..ab21db3 100644 --- a/GOVERNANCE.md +++ b/GOVERNANCE.md @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ standardization. implementations (either 1 client + 2 servers, or 2 clients + 1 server) to be eligible for inclusion. 5. Protocols in the "ext" namespace are eligible for inclusion only if ACKed by - at least one other member. + at least 2 members. 6. Protocols in the "ext" namespace must have at least one open-source client & one open-source server implementation to be eligible for inclusion. 7. "Open-source" is defined as distributed with an Open Source Initiative -- cgit v1.2.3