| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
xdg_positioner is a method for declarative positioning of child surfaces
(currently only xdg_popup surfaces). A client creates a description of a
positioning logic using the xdg_positioner interface. The xdg_positioner
object is then used when creating a xdg_popup for describing how the
child surface should be positioned in relation to the parent surface.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Yong Bakos <ybakos@humanoriented.com>
Acked-by: Quentin Glidic <sardemff7+git@sardemff7.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryce Harrington <bryce@osg.samsung.com>
|
|
Turn xdg_popup into plain temporary child surfaces without any grabbing
or mapping order requirements by default.
In order to create grabbing popup chains, a new request 'grab' is
introduced which enables more or less the same semantics and
requirements as xdg_popup previously had related to grabbing, stacking
and mapping order.
This enables using xdg_popup for creating tooltips and other user
interface elements that does not want to take an explicit grab.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Yong Bakos <ybakos@humanoriented.com>
Acked-by: Quentin Glidic <sardemff7+git@sardemff7.net>
|
|
The reason for using wl_surface before was that xdg_popup and
xdg_surface (now xdg_toplevel) had no common interface other than
wl_surface, but since xdg_surface is now the base interface, lets use
that.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Yong Bakos <ybakos@humanoriented.com>
Reviewed-by: Benoit Gschwind <gschwind@gnu-log.net>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Glidic <sardemff7+git@sardemff7.net>
|
|
The long lines stood out, break them by putting the summary on its own
line.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Yong Bakos <ybakos@humanoriented.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Benoit Gschwind <gschwind@gnu-log.net>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Glidic <sardemff7+git@sardemff7.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Yong Bakos <ybakos@humanoriented.com>
Acked-by: Quentin Glidic <sardemff7+git@sardemff7.net>
|
|
It makes the structure consistent with most other protocols and
provides a clear separation between what is done by the server and what
is done by the client.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Yong Bakos <ybakos@humanoriented.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Glidic <sardemff7+git@sardemff7.net>
|
|
Split out toplevel window like requests and events into a new interface
called xdg_toplevel, and turn xdg_surface into a generic base interface
which others extends.
xdg_popup is changed to extend the xdg_surface.
The configure event in xdg_surface was split up making
xdg_surface.configure an event only carrying the serial number, while a
new xdg_toplevel.configure event carries the other data previously sent
via xdg_surface.configure. xdg_toplevel.configure is made to extend,
via the latch-state mechanism, xdg_surface.configure and depends on
that event to synchronize state.
Other future xdg_surface based extensions are meant to also extend
xdg_surface.configure for relevant window type dependend state
synchronization.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Yong Bakos <ybakos@humanoriented.com>
Acked-by: Quentin Glidic <sardemff7+git@sardemff7.net>
|
|
Some application may wish to restrict their window in size, but
xdg-shell has no mechanism for the client to specify a maximum or
minimum size.
As a result, the compositor may try to maximize or fullscreen a window
while the client would not allow for the requested size.
Add new requests "set_max_size" and "set_min_size" to xdg-shell so that
the client can tell the compositor what would be its smallest/largest
acceptable size, and that the compositor can decide if maximize or
fullscreen is achievable, draw an accurate animation, etc.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764413
Reviewed-by: Yong Bakos <ybakos@humanoriented.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
|
|
this change ensures that the client will set its initial state
before performing any drawing, ensuring that there is no mismatch
when creating a surface with a non-default state
(eg. maximize, fullscreen, ...)
looking at the following event flows:
1) wl_surface.attach, wl_surface.commit, xdg_shell.get_xdg_surface
2) wl_surface.attach, xdg_shell.get_xdg_surface, wl_surface.commit
3) xdg_shell.get_xdg_surface, wl_surface.commit, xdg_surface.configure,
wl_surface.attach, wl_surface.commit
only 3) is now valid, while 1) and 2) will trigger errors as a result
of handling buffers prior to creating the xdg surface
Signed-off-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre@mecheye.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryce Harrington <bryce@osg.samsung.com>
|
|
As of version 6, the new unstable protocol discovery semantics are
used, so lets remove the enum and request that made up the old one.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
|
|
This copies the version 5 of the XML to a new version 6 version, while
at the same time the interface names are changed to use the unstable
naming convention.
A whitespace cleanup was done as no git-blame:ability would be lost
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryce Harrington <bryce@osg.samsung.com>
|
|
This patch was intended to be part of the coming v6 version of the
xdg_shell protocol. It is an semantically backward incompatible change,
so it cannot be implemented in xdg_shell v5 without breaking
compatibility with available clients.
This reverts commit 275fd34023fabdcb487f2adf2fe80bda1e4bf0dc.
|
|
this change ensures that the client will set its initial state
before performing any drawing, ensuring that there is no mismatch
when creating a surface with a non-default state
(eg. maximize, fullscreen, ...)
looking at the following event flows:
1) wl_surface.attach, wl_surface.commit, xdg_shell.get_xdg_surface
2) wl_surface.attach, xdg_shell.get_xdg_surface, wl_surface.commit
3) xdg_shell.get_xdg_surface, wl_surface.commit, xdg_surface.configure,
wl_surface.attach, wl_surface.commit
only 3) is now valid, while 1) and 2) will trigger errors as a result
of handling buffers prior to creating the xdg surface
Reviewed-by: Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre@mecheye.net>
Signed-off-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryce Harrington <bryce@osg.samsung.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre@mecheye.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryce Harrington <bryce@osg.samsung.com>
|
|
The scanner parses CDATA in <entry> but lets it disappear otherwise. To have
descriptive text associated with the <entry>, we need a <description> tag -
and that must have a summary attribute. The current scanner doesn't handle
<description> however, so to get the summary printed in the output file we
still need the summary attribute in the entry tag too.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Reviewed-by: Derek Foreman <derekf@osg.samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
|
|
This migration did not involve any renaming, xdg_shell already has its
own form of unstable protocol semantics. The next xdg_shell protocol
change will change to the new naming semantics, and not earlier in
order to minimize breakage.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
|
