From 9c3de0c87a00e09e8a51d7f6de461a0221c6409b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: stanley lieber Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:07:56 -0500 Subject: fortunes: ./configure CFLAGS="-I$HOME/source/harvey/ape/amd64/include -I$HOME/source/harvey/ape/include -mno-red-zone -ffreestanding -fno-builtin -nostdlib -trigraphs -D_SUSV2_SOURCE -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_LIMITS_EXTENSION -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_BSD_EXTENSION -DHAVE_SOCK_OPTS -DHARVEY -DPlan9" LDFLAGS="-static $HOME/source/harvey/ape/amd64/lib/crt1.o $HOME/source/harvey/ape/amd64/lib/crti.o $HOME/source/harvey/ape/amd64/lib/crtn.o -L$HOME/source/harvey/ape/amd64/lib -L$HOME/source/harvey/amd64/lib" LIBS="-lbsd -lap -lc" LIBM="" --prefix=$HOME/source/harvey/ape/ports *--host=x86_64-linux-gnu --build=x86_64-harvey *--enable-shared=no --- lib/theo | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+) (limited to 'lib/theo') diff --git a/lib/theo b/lib/theo index 5617c6081..a9cd963c8 100644 --- a/lib/theo +++ b/lib/theo @@ -522,3 +522,48 @@ There are too few of us, we cannot take on every problem. Everyone, please ignore these trolls who are cross-posting. Essentially, you are on your own. :-) I am not so sure. +obviously. +I don't know, but I'll think about it later, because I am busy. +So the original idea wasn't yours. And now you think it can't work. And you are still talking about it. I see. Very interesting. +That statement is full of potential for misunderstanding, and cannot be left alone. +I was wrong. +Thanks. +Careful there :-) +That is incorrect advice for the OpenBSD world. +Your mistake. +This bug report totally sucks. +what is "this case"? +my advice: walk away from this one. +Generally Unix has no way of doing this. +So what do you really mean here? +Is a crash a performance impact? +what is the goal? +Your emails only contain opinions. +words words words words +Are you done? +Doesn't that send shivers down your spine? +Your bug report is too incomplete. Can't help you. +No. +We'd rather jump off a cliff. +Good luck with that. +Looking forward to you providing code which solves the problem. +This feature is probably older than you. +it is behaving *exactly* as intended. +There are a few compromises. +I think I know a perfect candidate to take this further: You. +Seriously? +The OpenBSD process is quite well understood. Use the best methods, doubt what you do, refractor. +Hey, it looks like you are just trying to be a dick. +Does your mother know? +It's great that you have an opinion. +Run something else! We don't care! +That's a load of bull. +Your opinions count for zero. +To achieve merit, you must do the homework you assigned yourself. +Get serious. +and I wanna build a rocket ship... +No thanks. +The problem is obvious. +If you don't have the skill to do it, well that's too bad... +You didn't do your homework, and it blew up in your face. Then you wrote a few paragraphs. Then I replied. That is the whole sad story. +I tried to read the rest of what you wrote. It makes no sense. -- cgit v1.2.3