From a8e96342e57d1311f23c626af74f6c2c90db7114 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tony-LunarG <tony@lunarg.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 15:12:55 -0600
Subject: vkcube: Resize on SUBOPTIMAL if necessary

Change-Id: I6421c661880695ba359969fb5e8752e2140167f5
---
 cube/cube.cpp | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'cube/cube.cpp')

diff --git a/cube/cube.cpp b/cube/cube.cpp
index ed572e39..2e423922 100644
--- a/cube/cube.cpp
+++ b/cube/cube.cpp
@@ -807,8 +807,13 @@ void Demo::draw() {
         // must be recreated:
         resize();
     } else if (result == vk::Result::eSuboptimalKHR) {
-        // swapchain is not as optimal as it could be, but the platform's
-        // presentation engine will still present the image correctly.
+        // SUBOPTIMAL could be due to resize
+        vk::SurfaceCapabilitiesKHR surfCapabilities;
+        auto result = gpu.getSurfaceCapabilitiesKHR(surface, &surfCapabilities);
+        VERIFY(result == vk::Result::eSuccess);
+        if (surfCapabilities.currentExtent.width != width || surfCapabilities.currentExtent.height != height) {
+            resize();
+        }
     } else if (result == vk::Result::eErrorSurfaceLostKHR) {
         inst.destroySurfaceKHR(surface, nullptr);
         create_surface();
-- 
cgit v1.2.3